By Noah E. Friedkin
This ebook describes how a community of interpersonal impact can function to shape agreements between folks who occupy diversified positions in a gaggle or association. It offers an account of consensus formation that's special in its integration of labor from the fields of social psychology and sociology thinking about workforce dynamics and social buildings.
Read or Download A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences) PDF
Best social psychology & interactions books
This quantity will offer an authoritative, state-of-the-art evaluation of the sphere of intergroup strategies. the amount is split into 9 significant sections on cognition, motivation, emotion, communique and social effect, altering intergroup relatives, social comparability, self-identity, tools and purposes.
As entertainers, organizations, or even the govt pander to the bottom universal denominator, American existence turns into more and more vicarious, prefabricated, and bereft of which means. This ebook examines modern American recognition, contemplating the criteria that experience pushed society towards gossip and sensationalism on the rate of substance and intensity.
Why do just a couple of people get to assert I love my job”? It turns out unfair that discovering achievement at work is like successful a lottery; that in basic terms a few fortunate ones get to suppose valued by means of their organizations, to believe like they belong. think a global the place virtually all people wakes up encouraged to visit paintings, feels relied on and valued during the day, then returns domestic feeling fulfilled.
Additional info for A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences)
47-51). However, this interactionist literature on agreement formation has several important limitations. First, it is fuzzy on the precise manner in which a focal actor integrates different interpersonal influences. Many studies in this tradition have concentrated on the development of agreements in dyads and, therefore, do not bear on the question of how multiple sources of conflicting influences are reconciled by an actor. Second, the implications of larger influence networks is not explicated.
These three avenues are (a) a structural approach suggested by Merton that attends to contextual conditions that foster and impede the development of interpersonal agreements, (b) an interactionist approach that attends to the influence processes that form interpersonal agreements, and (c) a social choice approach that attends to procedures through which collective decisions on issues are made in the absence of a preexisting consensus. The work on a structural theory of social influence developed in Chapter 2 will advance the interactionist approach, but it does so by taking into account contextual features of the social structure in which the influence process unfolds.
Whether or not actors who are exogenously equivalent also have identical equilibrium opinions depends upon the network of endogenous influences. The influence network potentially disrupts the correspondence between the personal circumstances of actors and their settled opinions. The notion that actors in similar circumstances have similar opinions follows from the classical assumption of actor independence. When this assumption of independence is relaxed to allow for actors who are responding, not only to their own circumstances, but also to the responses of other actors, then the "common fate" hypothesis falls to ground.